Scope inputs
A useful first brief identifies spalls and broken edges, localized section loss, cracks/joints requiring scope definition, failed transitions, surface deterioration, and repair-to-coating compatibility.
What the capability includes
Field verification for scope confirmation; compatible preparation; defined repairs/details where included; application/installation sequence; cure protection; and turnover observations appropriate to the fictional scope.
What it does not claim
No engineering/stamping, environmental remediation, hazardous-material response, regulatory certification, or independent compliance determination. Product/system selection in a real project would follow specifications, exposure data, substrate testing, and manufacturer requirements.
Related decisions
Use the planning resources to separate scope-definition questions from execution. Capability pages explain what Iron Meridian would perform; resources explain how an owner should think about preparation, repair, outage windows, and pricing inputs.
Where the scope changes
Repair quantity can be small in area and still control the schedule. A broken dock edge, failed joint shoulder, or deep spall may require demolition geometry, reinforcing review, repair placement, cure, grinding, or transition work before the larger surface system can proceed.
That is why the repair route remains separate from resurfacing education. This page defines the contractor execution scope; the related resource helps an owner recognize when “coat the floor” is hiding a substrate-repair problem.